UKGC Withholds Victoria Gate Casino Suspension Details
Regulator cites 'law enforcement' exemption to deny access to information regarding the casino's month-long licence suspension in late 2025.
The UK Gambling Commission has refused to release documents detailing the reasons behind the 26-day licence suspension of Victoria Gate Casino. Citing a 'law enforcement' exemption, the regulator argued that disclosure would compromise its future investigations and ability to regulate the industry effectively.
Article Content
The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has refused to release key documents explaining the temporary licence suspension of Victoria Gate Casino, a major land-based operator in Leeds. In a response to a Freedom of Information (FOI) request dated 5 December 2025, the regulator confirmed it holds the information but is withholding it to protect its investigative functions.
The request sought details behind the suspension of VGC Leeds Limited's operating licence, which forced the casino to close between 31 October 2025 and 25 November 2025. The public sought access to reports, penalties, and compliance requirements related to the action.
Why This Matters to Consumers
A licence suspension is one of the most serious actions the UKGC can take, indicating a significant concern about an operator's ability to uphold its licensing conditions, which are designed to protect the public. While the casino has since reopened, the refusal to disclose the reasons for the closure leaves consumers without a full picture of the compliance failures that occurred.
This case highlights the limits of regulatory transparency, balancing the public's right to know against the Commission's need to maintain the integrity of its enforcement processes.
Details of the Refusal
The FOI request specifically asked for:
- Any UKGC reports that supported the licence suspension.
- The requirements imposed on VGC Leeds Limited for the suspension to be lifted.
- Details of any financial or other penalties.
- Information on the regulator's plan for "continued monitoring" of the operator.
In its response, the UKGC invoked section 31(1)g of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, an exemption related to 'law enforcement'. The Commission, which acts as a regulatory body, argued that releasing this information would likely prejudice its ability to carry out its statutory functions.
The regulator stated that disclosure would:
- Reveal investigative techniques: Releasing the information could show how the Commission assesses operators, potentially allowing others to circumvent compliance checks in the future.
- Undermine trust: The UKGC believes disclosure could damage the trust it has with operators, making them less forthcoming with information during future compliance and enforcement activities.
The Public Interest Test
The Commission acknowledged a public interest in transparency and holding the regulator to account. However, it concluded that this was outweighed by the need to protect its regulatory methods.
"There is a strong public interest in preserving the processes that the Commission has in place to assess operators’ compliance," the response stated. "If this information were released it would undermine that confidence... We consider that the public interest is better served by withholding this information, ensuring that consumers are protected through our processes rather than releasing information about our processes."
While the specific failings of VGC Leeds Limited remain undisclosed, the suspension itself serves as a public record of a serious regulatory intervention. The Commission's decision to withhold the details, however, means the public must trust that the regulator's unpublished processes are robust enough to ensure sustained compliance from the operator.