UKGC Conceals TGP Europe Licence Fee Data

Article Content

UKGC Refuses to Disclose TGP Europe's Licence Fees

The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has refused to disclose the value of licence fees paid by major white-label operator TGP Europe, citing the protection of commercial interests. The decision, revealed in a Freedom of Information (FOI) response dated 29 October 2023, effectively shields the operator's UK revenue from public view.

Why This Data Matters

Licence fees paid to the UKGC are calculated based on an operator's Gross Gambling Yield (GGY) — the amount retained by an operator after paying out winnings but before deducting operating costs. This makes licence fee data a direct indicator of a company's scale and financial performance within the British gambling market.

TGP Europe is a prominent B2B operator that provides a 'white label' platform for numerous betting brands. This means many different websites operate under TGP Europe's single UK licence. For consumers, understanding the scale of the underlying licence holder is crucial for grasping the true size of the entity they are transacting with, even if the branding on the website is different.

Details of the FOI Refusal

The request sought the value of licence fees paid by TGP Europe and its white-label partners since 1 January 2022. In its response, the UKGC made two key points:

1. White label partners do not pay fees directly. The Commission clarified that as these partners are not licensed by the UKGC, they do not pay fees. The responsibility lies solely with the licence holder, TGP Europe.
2. Information is exempt from disclosure. The UKGC confirmed it holds the requested information for TGP Europe but considers it exempt under Section 43(2) of the Freedom of Information Act. This section protects information that would, or would be likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of any person.

The regulator stated that releasing the licence fee value would "effectively be releasing the Gross Gambling Yield (GGY) of individual operators." It argued that this would give competitors an unfair commercial advantage and that operators have a "reasonable expectation that this level of detail would not be published on an individual basis."

The Public Interest Test

The Commission is required to weigh the public interest in disclosure against the interest in maintaining the exemption.

• Arguments for disclosure included promoting the transparency of the UKGC, improving public understanding of the industry, and holding the regulator to account.
• Arguments for withholding centred on the potential for commercial prejudice, the availability of aggregated industry data, and the risk that disclosure could discourage operators from providing the UKGC with information in the future.

Ultimately, the UKGC concluded that "the public interest is best served through maintaining this exemption," judging there was a greater than 50% chance that disclosure would cause prejudice to the commercial interests of its licensees.

Significance for Consumers and Transparency

The UKGC's decision highlights a significant conflict between regulatory transparency and commercial confidentiality in the UK gambling industry. While the Commission publishes extensive aggregated data, this refusal prevents public scrutiny of the financial scale of individual white-label giants like TGP Europe.

For consumers, it means the true size of the company behind dozens of seemingly independent betting sites remains opaque. The decision underscores the limits of the FOI Act in obtaining specific financial data from operators, prioritising the protection of business interests over the public's right to detailed information about major players in the market.