UKGC Withholds Lottery Software Details
Regulator also declines to provide lottery winner data, citing excessive costs in response to a Freedom of Information request.
The UK Gambling Commission has declined to name the software used for National Lottery draws, citing an unclear request. The regulator also withheld data on the number of winners by year and postcode, claiming the cost to retrieve the information would be excessive. This response limits public insight into the operational integrity and outcomes of the UK's primary lottery.
Article Content
UKGC Declines to Name Lottery RNG Software
The UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) has withheld information about the software used for National Lottery draws and refused to provide detailed winner statistics, according to a Freedom of Information (FOI) response dated 29 November 2023.
The response limits public visibility into the technical mechanisms and statistical outcomes of the UK's most popular lottery game, raising questions about regulatory transparency.
Context: The Importance of Transparency
For consumers, the integrity of any game of chance is paramount. The National Lottery relies on the public's trust that its number selection process is truly random and free from interference. The software responsible for this random number generation (RNG) is a critical component of that trust. Similarly, data on the distribution of winners can provide insights into the game's outcomes over time.
The UKGC's role as the regulator is to ensure the National Lottery is run fairly and transparently. Therefore, its handling of requests for such fundamental information is a matter of significant public interest.
Breakdown of the FOI Request
The request submitted to the UKGC was composed of two parts:
- The name of the software used to pick randomly selected numbers for the National Lottery.
- The number of winners for each year and by postcode.
The Commission withheld the information for both parts of the request, citing different procedural reasons for each.
Part 1: Random Number Generation Software
In response to the query about the lottery's RNG software, the UKGC stated the request was "not sufficiently clear to enable us to locate or identify the recorded information." The Commission has asked the requestor for clarification, noting that a revised query would be treated as a new request.
This means that the name of the software underpinning the randomness of the National Lottery draw remains undisclosed to the public through this request.
Part 2: Lottery Winner Data
The UKGC refused to provide data on the number of winners by year and postcode, invoking Section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act. This section allows public authorities to refuse requests where the cost of compliance would exceed a £450 limit, equivalent to 18 hours of staff time.
The Commission estimated that fulfilling the request would take longer than 18 hours. It noted that an initial search for ticket sales data returned results spanning a three-year period from 27 June 2020 to 27 June 2023, and compiling this volume of information would be too costly. The UKGC suggested the requestor could refine their query to cover a smaller dataset.
Significance for Consumers
While the UKGC's response is based on provisions within the FOIA, the outcome is a lack of transparency on key aspects of the National Lottery's operation. Consumers are left without official information on the technology used to ensure random draws or the geographical and historical distribution of prize winners.
The refusal highlights the challenges citizens and consumer groups face when seeking large-scale data from public bodies. For an organisation tasked with overseeing fairness in gambling, the inability or unwillingness to provide such foundational information may be a concern for players seeking assurance about the integrity of the games they participate in.