UKGC: No Specific White Label Sports Ad Rules
Illustration for UKGC: No Specific White Label Sports Ad Rules

Article Content

UKGC Holds No Specific Guidance on White Label Sports Advertising

A Freedom of Information (FOI) request has revealed that the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) holds no specific guidance relating to the advertising of white label gambling products at sporting events. The response confirms the regulator has not issued explicit rules for operators or marketing bodies on this matter, including which website URLs should be displayed to the public.

Why This Matters for Consumers

White label gambling sites are common in the UK market. This business model involves a company (the white label) providing the branding and marketing for a gambling website, while another company (the platform provider) holds the operating licence and manages the technical and regulatory infrastructure.

For consumers, the brand advertised on a football shirt or pitch-side hoarding may not be the company that holds the UKGC licence and is ultimately responsible for player funds and fair practices. The lack of specific guidance on which URL to display in advertisements means consumers may be directed to the marketing brand's website, making it less clear who the underlying licensed operator is. This can complicate research and due diligence for players wanting to verify an operator's regulatory standing.

Details of the FOI Request

The request, dated 29 October 2023, asked the Gambling Commission for two key pieces of information:

  1. Any general guidance given to white label licensees, providers, and sporting bodies regarding the advertising of white label products at sporting events.
  2. Any specific guidance concerning the specificity of which URLs can be displayed in such advertisements.

In its official response, the UKGC stated: "I can confirm that there is no specific information falling within the scope of your request held by the Gambling Commission."

The regulator did, however, point to its existing framework, noting that all licensees must adhere to the Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP). Specifically, it referenced social responsibility code 5.1.6, which mandates compliance with UK advertising codes (such as the CAP and BCAP codes). This code requires that advertising is socially responsible and not misleading, but it does not contain prescriptive rules for the unique structure of white label partnerships.

Industry Significance

The disclosure highlights a potential regulatory grey area. While all gambling advertising must meet broad standards of social responsibility, the Commission has not developed or issued rules tailored to the complexities of the white label model in high-profile settings like sports events.

This leaves the interpretation of general advertising rules up to licensees and their white label partners. For consumers, it underscores the importance of looking beyond the advertised brand and identifying the licensed company that operates the service before signing up and depositing funds. The licensed operator's name is required to be displayed on the gambling website itself, typically in the footer.

J

Written by

Regulatory Affairs Editor

LLB (Hons) in Law, University of Bristol. Postgraduate Diploma in Financial Regulation, University of Reading.

James has spent 12 years in gambling compliance and regulatory technology, previously working as Senior Compliance Analyst at a UK-based regulatory consultancy advising licensed operators on LCCP adherence.

Tags

ukgc white label advertising freedom of information sports sponsorship regulation

More Insights